Making It a Great Year

by Brian on 01-01-2010

in business,creativity,economics

Literally!

Out of all the things buzzing in my head for a “new decade” post, the idea I want to highlight most is the increasing importance of making stuff.

It’s been germinating in my mind via MakerCulture in the Making by UWO + Ryerson’s online journalism classes. Last week it was crystalized by Umair Haque’s “Builders’ Manifesto” for HBR:

Today’s builders are igniting the distant grandchild of yesterday’s industrial revolution: an institutional revolution for a post-industrial world. They are forging the new building blocks — from ethical investment, to deep journalism, to socially useful finance, to universally accessible communication — that a rusting economy, society, and polity so urgently demand.

The 21st century doesn’t need more leaders – nor more leadership. Only Builders can kickstart the chain reaction of a better, more authentic kind of prosperity.

Our culture has already become very goal-driven in a pernicious way: the numbers and titles are often treated as more valuable than real value. Look at Enron, look at AIG. Look at the gamesmanship in politics. Look at what people are not learning at school…

But this week I’ve noticed a change in the way people are assessing their past-year performance and setting their New Year goals.

It isn’t just about hitting targets within institutional frameworks, I’m seeing more of us talking about learning and stretching beyond given boundaries… making stuff with the resources at hand — things we can actually own and control — creating bits of value that might be small, but at least we can keep…

It’s another example of the web as our way to understanding. I’m watching people use it as a platform for tinkering and trying things, learning and taking on new challenges, putting their work out in the open for feedback and discoverability, collaborating on projects and sharing knowledge, and growing in the process.

This isn’t new (remember this is one of my earliest public predictions) but the fact it is becoming more deliberate and openly accountable is noteworthy. There seem to be new conventions emerging (i.e. replacing resumés with reputation and digital breadcrumbs).

Eventually organizations will learn to incorporate makership, or constructivism, or whatever you want to call it. Entrepreneurship will eventually be brought within institutional bounds… eventually. For now, they still have a lot of learning to do.

Locally I noticed Scott Webb contrast his creative and entrepreneurial endeavours with the institutional apathy he sees at his “day job”:

within my corporate cubicle life, my job usually requires us to do an annual review and most people don’t care about it.  It’s a time they despise and try to avoid.

Compare that attitude with what we see around the blogosphere, especially in everyone’s annual reviews.

Look at Pat Dryburgh’s post written in the wee hours of Christmas morning, outlining how he’s going to work on making his approach to design more purposeful and strategic in the new year.

One of Kevin Van Lierop’s year-end posts is what made all this click for me:

This past year has been a productive one for me in terms of photography.  Not only did I purchase my first DSLR, but I started a community group, have had a number of images published and have even made a little bit on money on the side because of my photos.

The number of people whom I have met because of photography has increased within the last few months and I am glad to have met each and everyone of them.

All in all this past year has been, what I will call, an overwhelming success.

The success we make for ourselves is so much more generative and sustainable than the kind that’s merely won and awarded “in recognition.”

And surprise surprise, research shows that making progress is the number one motivator at work. According to an article in the current Harvard Business Review, this part by Teresa M. Amabile and Steven J. Kramer:

On days when workers have the sense they’re making headway in their jobs, or when they receive support that helps them overcome obstacles, their emotions are most positive and their drive to succeed is at its peak.

Ironically, I’m deeply skeptical about our macro-economic prospects for the next couple of years, yet I’m writing a very positive post.

I’m optimistic because I know that despite the worst that could happen, as long as we’ve adopted the spirit of makership and mastered autonomous creativity, we have the will and means to adapt and endure anything.

So bring it on…

Related Posts:

  • kvanlierop

    Brian. Thanks for the link.

    I'm excited for 2010 and making it what I want it to be.

    After what I personally accomplished in 2009 I think I now have a better understanding about the time and effort needed to make things happen.

    I hope that everyone's 2010 turns out to be a year in which they make things happen, for their own personal gain and enjoyment, but for their communities as well.

    Last of all, I am super excited about my new project, http://fiftytwoweeks.ca/ , which is all about creativity and exploration.

  • http://brianfrank.ca Brian Frank

    My sentiment's the same. I looked back at my New Year review posts (several) from last year and I feel like I have so much more direction, momentum, and discipline. I'm genuinely optimistic for this year (in the conditional way I explained).

    Looking forward to seeing what comes out of your FiftyTwoWeeks project. I'll keep my ears open for ideas.

  • nuwomb

    Brian, This is exactly the track I am on, so this post is bang on.

    It's amazing how synchronicity works too. I literally read the first few (like 3 or 4 pages) of Dan Pinks “DRIVE” tonight and he talked about an experiment of monkeys solving a puzzle. It was placed in their “cages” for no reason. The monkeys started to solve the puzzle – without any form of recognition – no food, special favors, monkey sex, affection. They got nothing out of solving the puzzles. After a couple weeks – they tested the monkeys and they could do the puzzle test within a minute.

    They were motivated by the sheer desire to solve this puzzle. There is a drive in us that is very strong and does not need to be awarded any kind of recognition. We simply do things out of enjoyment or interest.

    When the monkeys were given reward – such as food – they actually performed worse!

    Again, I've only read a few pages and stumbled back to your page tonight as I edit photographs for a client tomorrow.

    Get this Brian, I was off on stress leave while the 'annual reviews' were happening at my work. They never asked me to fill it out and just put their own comments in. Not even once I was back – “it doesn't really matter.”

    Yet, on my own blog – I did a 5 or 6 part review that is very in depth for me. For no other reason than to reflect on what I personally accomplished this year and felt proud of. It's helped me to see where I came from and where 2010 will head. I also have a lot more direction and discipline. It's nice to feel positive and I hope to make it out to some geek dinners for once!!!

  • http://brianfrank.ca Brian Frank

    I've banged my head against that wall plenty of times; nothing good ever came out of it. It will just occupy precious attention you could be using to either a) get promoted through the system as it is (giving you leverage to actually have a positive effect) or b) get out of there.

    An important lesson I learned is don't assume the person who told you “it doesn't really matter” wasn't exactly like you a few years ago. They're not against you, they're fighting the same battle for autonomy as you but they've been there longer and lost more.

    Organizations are like bread factories that bleach all the nutrients out of the grain and then artificially add a few select ones back into the mix.

    Fixing the problem is very difficult. These ideas have been around at least since the 1960's, e.g. McGregor's Theory Y and even Abraham Maslow wrote a book on Management. Even well before that John Dewey worked out some similar (I think better) ideas and famously applied them to education.

    The problem is that organizing for intrinsic motivation doesn't scale very effectively. Without structure there are a lot of cracks for people to get left behind and free-riders to take advantage of, so the system evolves back to the kind of organizations we know and hate.

    It's not impossible though (I hope) — which is why I spent years working on it. The solution will require having the right technology (which we might have now) and preparing enough of the right leaders (will take time) to propagate the right culture.

  • johnmcgeough

    Brian, today our young people are being cultivated in a uniform hothouse environment created by those who have set themselves up as experts. These experts attempt to define education so narrowly that a maker culture will be almost impossible to develop if we are unable to turn the tide of manufactured mediocrity. Great post.

  • johnmcgeough

    Brian, today our young people are being cultivated in a uniform hothouse environment created by those who have set themselves up as experts. These experts attempt to define education so narrowly that a maker culture will be almost impossible to develop if we are unable to turn the tide of manufactured mediocrity. Great post.