Serendipity & Generativity: Twitter at Its Best

by Brian on 11-23-2009

in creativity,education

Here’s Chris Brogan’s talk on serendipity at last week’s Web 2.0 Expo, here’s my earlier one relating to generativity, and here’s one of the best examples I’ve seen of serendipity & generativity in action on Twitter:

twitter serendipity

No, they’re not on the same list, nor are Jeff Jarvis and The Clever Sheep ever normally in the same conversations (and as far as I know, neither follows the other). and the links are to two different posts on quite different blogs. But they complement perfectly, and they came to me in perfect sequence.

This is a completely random event.

Here are the links (both worth reading if you’re interested in education or social media; if you’re interested in both then they’re both must-reads) in reverse order for the sake of narrative:

• 21st Century Educators Don’t Say, “Hand It In.” They say, “Publish It!:

I see schools like this all too often. Educators, parents, families are dazzled by their flashy assessment and data systems, charts showing kids progress, and fancy, static, one-dimensional bulletin boards. All this is evidence of what their kids are “capable” of achieving. Isn’t it ironic? All this data, assessment, and evidence that lives nowhere that is authentic, relevant, or important to the actual student we are trying to develop. It takes more than collecting data or creating on computers to be a 21st century school. If educators are not having students publish regularly they are NOT preparing them for today or tomorrow.

• My case for moving beyond a printed senior thesis

By posting this project online I hope to open it up to involvement from those outside of the traditional Whitman community. A piece as long as this thesis will truly gain traction in the hands of the readers. By expanding the pool of potential readers and participants I hope to bring in voices and critiques that I would not otherwise hear. [...]

The reality is that the communication on the web happens faster, reaches more readers, and is inarguably the future of writing.

I love that by writing this, quoting those posts, and linking to them, they become a demonstration of the principles their authors hoped to express. This is what publishing has become, this is what education is becoming.

Two individuals took it upon themselves to publish something online, two more liked those thoughts enough to share — none of them could have known how much I’d benefit from those choices [they helped me express my own thoughts -- like "midwives," to use Plato's metaphor] — and here I am sharing it with you.

Knowledge has to live or we lose it.

It doesn’t live on paper — and it doesn’t live in computers (or in the cloud) either. It lives in what we do with it, what we think, what we learn, what we make, how we remix and share it with others.

By taking a bit of time to compose a few thoughts and place things in context, at least we’re perpetuating the potential for creativity. Do that and eventually good things will follow.

We don’t always know where creativity will lead, but I certainly know where creativity starts:  Here, now, always.

Related Posts:

  • Lyaeus

    Hi
    This is great stuff. The act of doing and saying it online creates so many possibilities closed off to paper forms – each work more a world to enter than a thing to pick up. I also think there are 2 points here too: the act of this kind of creation has a great teaching value for the warrior scholars of the future – it's also intrinsically social, which is better pedagogy; it also teaches students to think much more about the value of entertainment as scholarship, or scholarship as entertainment. I go into this at length here on PsychFutures if you have a mo: http://psychfutures.ning.com/profiles/blogs/the…

  • http://brianfrank.ca Brian Frank

    Thanks for the comment & link. I bookmarked the post and followed your feed — some great-looking links there I have to explore. As a long-time de facto lone-wolf edupunk I'm still very new to the conversation and very excited about it.

    For me there is no difference between what I consume for education and what I consume for entertainment. Some things I do for pure education, some for pure entertainment, but overall I keep coming back to the places where they meet.

    I think a lot more people would appreciate that and society would be a lot richer if we didn't have so many entrenched mindsets & institutional constraints preventing it from happening.

  • Lyaeus

    Hi Brian
    I agree. It's an odd thing to get across though. If you say, why not make your work entertaining, the immediate reaction is – but that would dumb down or dilute or confuse the message. Actually, if done right, it would make the message more memorable, sharable, discussable, but old habits and all that. Maybe you have to work on another level or start with the little things. Like I have some colleagues who blog. They write great content. Challenging, insightful. And then, because they're academic or academically trained, they stick an essay dull title on it. And the result: no one comments. No one gets past that yawn inducing heading. It might be the best heading to suit the post, but it's not an essay. It's going to be read online. And online, you're in the conversation business. If you take this further from blog posts to digital scholarship, the same rules apply. Even at the research stage, you can enrich the experience and start the conversations. How about writing it on a wiki and invite collaborators and friends to track its progress and slip in challenges or enrich it with alternative avenues as it's being done (see Lisa Spiro's here: http://www.pageflakes.com/lspiro/20929737/.) Include all the links to the stuff that didn't go into it – sometimes as rich or illustrative of the process as the things that did. Have an image gallery. Insert a video summary of the findings. Indicate whether it's full of stats so stat averse readers don't waste their time. Then wrap it all up and submit it in the dull print version if you have to, but keep the digital version open and alive. Put that on your CV. Employers are just as interested in students with ideas as they are students who know how to use the latest tools to put their ideas across. A skill that hits most students like a train when they enter business. Which itself needs some BizPunks of its own. I could go on!

  • http://brianfrank.ca Brian Frank

    I definitely agree with doing online versions differently to take advantage of links & conversation.

    I'm going to stand up for the word “essay” though. Scholarship has destroyed it. What pass as essays in school should be called “papers” or “articles”; they're pieces of material, units of measure.

    “Essay” literally means “to try”; it means to experiment or explore. It's an act of imagination — as you put it well, “open and alive.”

    The web may actually facilitate an “essay renaissance”…

  • http://www.andrewspittle.net/ Andrew Spittle

    Hi Brian-

    Nice post and as the author of “My case for moving beyond a printed senior thesis” I appreciate the link and analysis.

    I think your point that “[knowledge] lives in what we do with it, what we think, what we learn, what we make, how we remix and share it with others” is spot on and a perfect representation of what I was arguing for in my post. Thanks!

  • http://www.andrewspittle.net/ Andrew Spittle

    Hi Brian-

    Nice post and as the author of “My case for moving beyond a printed senior thesis” I appreciate the link and analysis.

    I think your point that “[knowledge] lives in what we do with it, what we think, what we learn, what we make, how we remix and share it with others” is spot on and a perfect representation of what I was arguing for in my post. Thanks!