Credibility vs. Notoriety

by Brian on 01-15-2009

in art,civics

Credibility vs. Notoriety: not sure which way to go with this… I’ve experimented a little bit with obscenity and attention-mongering; the results are indifferent but lean slightly towards the affirmative.

For the most part I’ve exercised a lot of restraint, done a lot of editing and self-censoring, employed a lot of discipline, and striven for a high degree of quality. Peruse my posts, you’d be hard-pressed to find much that turned out to be wrong, and more than a few of my posts have proven themselves exceptionally prescient and insightful..

The results of that are more clear: nobody gives a fuck. So here I am weighing the costs/benefits of credibility-maintenance vs. attention-getting.

Now, suppose I cultivated a more “colourful” or dangerous style. What do I stand to lose?

I guess convention-minded individuals and risk-averse organizations wouldn’t want to associate with me. But how much do I really want or need to associate with them, given how important it is to be open-minded and change-oriented these days?

Now what opportunities would I miss if I continue to be safe? How would I know if I continue being so conservative? That’s the first opportunity I’d miss: the opportunity to learn whether or not there are other kinds of opportunities. There’s the possibility that generating a little more notoriety would bring more attention my way. I don’t know if that’s true but how would I know if I don’t try?

I’ve invested enough in safe, disciplined writing to show I have control of my thoughts and words (as much as I could have). Anyone who tried to write me off as unstable or “merely” attention-mongering would look pretty foolish… or maybe that’s exactly the kind of opportunity I need.

Maybe having people question my credibility is exactly what I need — to help figure out who’s credible and who’s not. Someone could justifiably say they don’t like or approve of my (soon to be?) more colourful style, but they wouldn’t be justified to say my thinking therefore isn’t insightful, disciplined, or well-grounded. You’d lose a lot of credibility trying to argue that.

So fuck it. Credibility is essential but I need notoriety even more now.

Related Posts:

  • Pingback: More Retooling | Brnfrnk

  • http://jhbowden.wordpress.com/ J.H. Bowden

    “So here I am weighing the costs/benefits of credibility-maintenance vs. attention-getting…. Credibility is essential but I need notoriety even more now.”

    A question you have overlooked — whose attention do you seek? Anybody can get attention, e.g. the pregnant “man” watched by millions of Oprah’s trailer-trash viewers. Perhaps attention is not what you seek.

    Better to earn respect from the remaining few able to give such a spiritual payment in today’s world.

  • http://jhbowden.wordpress.com/ J.H. Bowden

    “So here I am weighing the costs/benefits of credibility-maintenance vs. attention-getting…. Credibility is essential but I need notoriety even more now.”

    A question you have overlooked — whose attention do you seek? Anybody can get attention, e.g. the pregnant “man” watched by millions of Oprah’s trailer-trash viewers. Perhaps attention is not what you seek.

    Better to earn respect from the remaining few able to give such a spiritual payment in today’s world.

  • http://brianfrank.ca Brian Frank

    Oh snap, I missed a pregnant man on Oprah!?

    Sorry J.H., couldn’t resist the joke. Thanks for the assurance/encouragement/guidance. I couldn’t agree more…

    But with that I feel a responsibility to bring people up as well — to show people there are more lasting means of fulfilment. It’s not so much about ‘saving’ people as it is about getting to the next level of “spiritual payment”: progressing past spiritual commerce to grasp the reigns of spiritual production, to be able to create one’s own “customers.” That’s freedom — and so much the better for the new customers too, who become a bit more empowered than if they’d spent their time watching the pregnant man (they’re investing in their own spiritual commerce).

    Btw I checked out your site and see we share much of the same taste in reading. I’m adding you to Google Reader.

    Cheers.

  • http://brianfrank.ca Brian Frank

    Oh snap, I missed a pregnant man on Oprah!?

    Sorry J.H., couldn't resist the joke. Thanks for the assurance/encouragement/guidance. I couldn't agree more…

    But with that I feel a responsibility to bring people up as well — to show people there are more lasting means of fulfilment. It's not so much about 'saving' people as it is about getting to the next level of “spiritual payment”: progressing past spiritual commerce to grasp the reigns of spiritual production, to be able to create one's own “customers.” That's freedom — and so much the better for the new customers too, who become a bit more empowered than if they'd spent their time watching the pregnant man (they're investing in their own spiritual commerce).

    Btw I checked out your site and see we share much of the same taste in reading. I'm adding you to Google Reader.

    Cheers.